From: Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@intel.com>
To: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org,
yhs@fb.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org,
sdf@google.com, haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>,
Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>,
Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@intel.com>,
Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@gmail.com>,
Maryam Tahhan <mtahhan@redhat.com>,
xdp-hints@xdp-project.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
Simon Horman <simon.horman@corigine.com>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@mellanox.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
Subject: [xdp-hints] Re: [PATCH bpf-next v6 06/18] ice: Support RX hash XDP hint
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 12:04:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZTZFNgTF5MVgZU6D@lzaremba-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZTKcZu2PVgVuFNNh@boxer>
On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 05:27:34PM +0200, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 07:05:12PM +0200, Larysa Zaremba wrote:
> > RX hash XDP hint requests both hash value and type.
> > Type is XDP-specific, so we need a separate way to map
> > these values to the hardware ptypes, so create a lookup table.
> >
> > Instead of creating a new long list, reuse contents
> > of ice_decode_rx_desc_ptype[] through preprocessor.
> >
> > Current hash type enum does not contain ICMP packet type,
> > but ice devices support it, so also add a new type into core code.
> >
> > Then use previously refactored code and create a function
> > that allows XDP code to read RX hash.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@intel.com>
> > ---
>
> (...)
>
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * ice_xdp_rx_hash_type - Get XDP-specific hash type from the RX descriptor
> > + * @eop_desc: End of Packet descriptor
> > + */
> > +static enum xdp_rss_hash_type
> > +ice_xdp_rx_hash_type(const union ice_32b_rx_flex_desc *eop_desc)
> > +{
> > + u16 ptype = ice_get_ptype(eop_desc);
> > +
> > + if (unlikely(ptype >= ICE_NUM_DEFINED_PTYPES))
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + return ice_ptype_to_xdp_hash[ptype];
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * ice_xdp_rx_hash - RX hash XDP hint handler
> > + * @ctx: XDP buff pointer
> > + * @hash: hash destination address
> > + * @rss_type: XDP hash type destination address
> > + *
> > + * Copy RX hash (if available) and its type to the destination address.
> > + */
> > +static int ice_xdp_rx_hash(const struct xdp_md *ctx, u32 *hash,
> > + enum xdp_rss_hash_type *rss_type)
> > +{
> > + const struct ice_xdp_buff *xdp_ext = (void *)ctx;
> > +
> > + *hash = ice_get_rx_hash(xdp_ext->pkt_ctx.eop_desc);
> > + *rss_type = ice_xdp_rx_hash_type(xdp_ext->pkt_ctx.eop_desc);
> > + if (!likely(*hash))
> > + return -ENODATA;
>
> maybe i have missed previous discussions, but why hash/rss_type are copied
> regardless of them being available? if i am missing something can you
> elaborate on that?
>
> also, !likely() construct looks tricky to me, I am not sure what was the
> intent behind it. other callbacks return -ENODATA in case NETIF_F_RXHASH
> is missing from dev->features.
>
Well, we get RX hash in the descriptor regardless of whether NETIF_F_RXHASH is
enabled (I have tested this), so no point in checking this in the hints
functions.
Regarding `!likely(*hash)`: we have already discussed that valid `hash == 0` is
very improbable, so there is no harm in treating it as a failure for the sake of
consistency with other hints functions. Basically I treat `hash == 0` here as
"no hash in the descriptor".
But there is an error in this code snippet that I see now: there also must be a
check that `rss_type != 0`, otherwise packet has an unhashable type, which must
result in `-ENODATA`.
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > const struct xdp_metadata_ops ice_xdp_md_ops = {
> > .xmo_rx_timestamp = ice_xdp_rx_hw_ts,
> > + .xmo_rx_hash = ice_xdp_rx_hash,
> > };
> > diff --git a/include/net/xdp.h b/include/net/xdp.h
> > index 349c36fb5fd8..eb77040b4825 100644
> > --- a/include/net/xdp.h
> > +++ b/include/net/xdp.h
> > @@ -427,6 +427,7 @@ enum xdp_rss_hash_type {
> > XDP_RSS_L4_UDP = BIT(5),
> > XDP_RSS_L4_SCTP = BIT(6),
> > XDP_RSS_L4_IPSEC = BIT(7), /* L4 based hash include IPSEC SPI */
> > + XDP_RSS_L4_ICMP = BIT(8),
> >
> > /* Second part: RSS hash type combinations used for driver HW mapping */
> > XDP_RSS_TYPE_NONE = 0,
> > @@ -442,11 +443,13 @@ enum xdp_rss_hash_type {
> > XDP_RSS_TYPE_L4_IPV4_UDP = XDP_RSS_L3_IPV4 | XDP_RSS_L4 | XDP_RSS_L4_UDP,
> > XDP_RSS_TYPE_L4_IPV4_SCTP = XDP_RSS_L3_IPV4 | XDP_RSS_L4 | XDP_RSS_L4_SCTP,
> > XDP_RSS_TYPE_L4_IPV4_IPSEC = XDP_RSS_L3_IPV4 | XDP_RSS_L4 | XDP_RSS_L4_IPSEC,
> > + XDP_RSS_TYPE_L4_IPV4_ICMP = XDP_RSS_L3_IPV4 | XDP_RSS_L4 | XDP_RSS_L4_ICMP,
> >
> > XDP_RSS_TYPE_L4_IPV6_TCP = XDP_RSS_L3_IPV6 | XDP_RSS_L4 | XDP_RSS_L4_TCP,
> > XDP_RSS_TYPE_L4_IPV6_UDP = XDP_RSS_L3_IPV6 | XDP_RSS_L4 | XDP_RSS_L4_UDP,
> > XDP_RSS_TYPE_L4_IPV6_SCTP = XDP_RSS_L3_IPV6 | XDP_RSS_L4 | XDP_RSS_L4_SCTP,
> > XDP_RSS_TYPE_L4_IPV6_IPSEC = XDP_RSS_L3_IPV6 | XDP_RSS_L4 | XDP_RSS_L4_IPSEC,
> > + XDP_RSS_TYPE_L4_IPV6_ICMP = XDP_RSS_L3_IPV6 | XDP_RSS_L4 | XDP_RSS_L4_ICMP,
> >
> > XDP_RSS_TYPE_L4_IPV6_TCP_EX = XDP_RSS_TYPE_L4_IPV6_TCP | XDP_RSS_L3_DYNHDR,
> > XDP_RSS_TYPE_L4_IPV6_UDP_EX = XDP_RSS_TYPE_L4_IPV6_UDP | XDP_RSS_L3_DYNHDR,
> > --
> > 2.41.0
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-23 10:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-12 17:05 [xdp-hints] [PATCH bpf-next v6 00/18] XDP metadata via kfuncs for ice + VLAN hint Larysa Zaremba
2023-10-12 17:05 ` [xdp-hints] [PATCH bpf-next v6 01/18] ice: make RX hash reading code more reusable Larysa Zaremba
2023-10-12 17:05 ` [xdp-hints] [PATCH bpf-next v6 02/18] ice: make RX HW timestamp " Larysa Zaremba
2023-10-12 17:05 ` [xdp-hints] [PATCH bpf-next v6 03/18] ice: Make ptype internal to descriptor info processing Larysa Zaremba
2023-10-12 17:05 ` [xdp-hints] [PATCH bpf-next v6 04/18] ice: Introduce ice_xdp_buff Larysa Zaremba
2023-10-12 17:05 ` [xdp-hints] [PATCH bpf-next v6 05/18] ice: Support HW timestamp hint Larysa Zaremba
2023-10-12 17:05 ` [xdp-hints] [PATCH bpf-next v6 06/18] ice: Support RX hash XDP hint Larysa Zaremba
2023-10-20 15:27 ` [xdp-hints] " Maciej Fijalkowski
2023-10-23 10:04 ` Larysa Zaremba [this message]
2023-10-12 17:05 ` [xdp-hints] [PATCH bpf-next v6 07/18] ice: Support XDP hints in AF_XDP ZC mode Larysa Zaremba
2023-10-17 16:13 ` [xdp-hints] " Maciej Fijalkowski
2023-10-17 16:37 ` Magnus Karlsson
2023-10-17 16:45 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2023-10-17 17:03 ` Larysa Zaremba
2023-10-18 10:43 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2023-10-20 15:29 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2023-10-23 9:37 ` Larysa Zaremba
2023-10-12 17:05 ` [xdp-hints] [PATCH bpf-next v6 08/18] xdp: Add VLAN tag hint Larysa Zaremba
2023-10-18 23:59 ` [xdp-hints] " Jakub Kicinski
2023-10-19 8:05 ` Larysa Zaremba
2023-10-12 17:05 ` [xdp-hints] [PATCH bpf-next v6 09/18] ice: Implement " Larysa Zaremba
2023-10-12 17:05 ` [xdp-hints] [PATCH bpf-next v6 10/18] ice: use VLAN proto from ring packet context in skb path Larysa Zaremba
2023-10-12 17:05 ` [xdp-hints] [PATCH bpf-next v6 11/18] ice: put XDP meta sources assignment under a static key condition Larysa Zaremba
2023-10-20 16:32 ` [xdp-hints] " Maciej Fijalkowski
2023-10-23 9:35 ` Larysa Zaremba
2023-10-28 19:55 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2023-10-31 14:22 ` Larysa Zaremba
2023-11-02 13:23 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2023-11-02 13:48 ` Larysa Zaremba
2023-10-31 17:32 ` Larysa Zaremba
2023-10-12 17:05 ` [xdp-hints] [PATCH bpf-next v6 12/18] veth: Implement VLAN tag XDP hint Larysa Zaremba
2023-10-12 17:05 ` [xdp-hints] [PATCH bpf-next v6 13/18] net: make vlan_get_tag() return -ENODATA instead of -EINVAL Larysa Zaremba
2023-10-12 17:05 ` [xdp-hints] [PATCH bpf-next v6 14/18] mlx5: implement VLAN tag XDP hint Larysa Zaremba
2023-10-17 12:40 ` [xdp-hints] " Tariq Toukan
2023-10-12 17:05 ` [xdp-hints] [PATCH bpf-next v6 15/18] selftests/bpf: Allow VLAN packets in xdp_hw_metadata Larysa Zaremba
2023-10-12 17:05 ` [xdp-hints] [PATCH bpf-next v6 16/18] selftests/bpf: Add flags and VLAN hint to xdp_hw_metadata Larysa Zaremba
2023-10-12 17:05 ` [xdp-hints] [PATCH bpf-next v6 17/18] selftests/bpf: Use AF_INET for TX in xdp_metadata Larysa Zaremba
2023-10-12 17:05 ` [xdp-hints] [PATCH bpf-next v6 18/18] selftests/bpf: Check VLAN tag and proto " Larysa Zaremba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.xdp-project.net/postorius/lists/xdp-hints.xdp-project.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZTZFNgTF5MVgZU6D@lzaremba-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=larysa.zaremba@intel.com \
--cc=alexandr.lobakin@intel.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=magnus.karlsson@gmail.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mtahhan@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=saeedm@mellanox.com \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=simon.horman@corigine.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=tariqt@mellanox.com \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
--cc=xdp-hints@xdp-project.net \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox