XDP hardware hints discussion mail archive
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	martin.lau@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
	alexandr.lobakin@intel.com, larysa.zaremba@intel.com,
	xdp-hints@xdp-project.net, anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com,
	yoong.siang.song@intel.com, boon.leong.ong@intel.com
Subject: [xdp-hints] Re: [PATCH bpf-next V1 3/7] selftests/bpf: xdp_hw_metadata track more timestamps
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2023 14:09:12 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZBTW+NP1pLPlXRqa@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <167906360589.2706833.6188844928251441787.stgit@firesoul>

On 03/17, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> To correlate the hardware RX timestamp with something, add tracking of
> two software timestamps both clock source CLOCK_TAI (see description in
> man clock_gettime(2)).

> XDP metadata is extended with xdp_timestamp for capturing when XDP
> received the packet. Populated with BPF helper bpf_ktime_get_tai_ns(). I
> could not find a BPF helper for getting CLOCK_REALTIME, which would have
> been preferred. In userspace when AF_XDP sees the packet another
> software timestamp is recorded via clock_gettime() also clock source
> CLOCK_TAI.

> Example output shortly after loading igc driver:

>    poll: 1 (0)
>    xsk_ring_cons__peek: 1
>    0x11fc958: rx_desc[7]->addr=10000000000f000 addr=f100 comp_addr=f000
>    rx_hash: 0x00000000
>    rx_timestamp:  1676297171760293047 (sec:1676297171.7603)
>    XDP RX-time:   1676297208760355863 (sec:1676297208.7604) delta  
> sec:37.0001
>    AF_XDP time:   1676297208760416292 (sec:1676297208.7604) delta  
> sec:0.0001 (60.429 usec)
>    0x11fc958: complete idx=15 addr=f000

> The first observation is that the 37 sec difference between RX HW vs XDP
> timestamps, which indicate hardware is likely clock source
> CLOCK_REALTIME, because (as of this writing) CLOCK_TAI is initialised
> with a 37 sec offset.

> The 60 usec (microsec) difference between XDP vs AF_XDP userspace is the
> userspace wakeup time. On this hardware it was caused by CPU idle sleep
> states, which can be reduced by tuning /dev/cpu_dma_latency.

> View current requested/allowed latency bound via:
>    hexdump --format '"%d\n"' /dev/cpu_dma_latency

> More explanation of the output and how this can be used to identify
> clock drift for the HW clock can be seen here[1]:

> [1]  
> https://github.com/xdp-project/xdp-project/blob/master/areas/hints/xdp_hints_kfuncs02_driver_igc.org

> Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>

Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>

With a small nit below.

> ---
>   .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c  |    8 ++-
>   tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c      |   46  
> ++++++++++++++++++--
>   tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_metadata.h         |    1
>   3 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c  
> b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c
> index 4c55b4d79d3d..f2a3b70a9882 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/xdp_hw_metadata.c
> @@ -69,9 +69,11 @@ int rx(struct xdp_md *ctx)
>   		return XDP_PASS;
>   	}

> -	if (!bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_timestamp(ctx, &meta->rx_timestamp))
> -		bpf_printk("populated rx_timestamp with %llu", meta->rx_timestamp);
> -	else
> +	if (!bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_timestamp(ctx, &meta->rx_timestamp)) {
> +		meta->xdp_timestamp = bpf_ktime_get_tai_ns();
> +		bpf_printk("populated rx_timestamp with  %llu", meta->rx_timestamp);
> +		bpf_printk("populated xdp_timestamp with %llu", meta->xdp_timestamp);
> +	} else
>   		meta->rx_timestamp = 0; /* Used by AF_XDP as not avail signal */

Nit: curly braces around else {} block as well?


>   	if (!bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_hash(ctx, &meta->rx_hash))
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c  
> b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c
> index 1c8acb68b977..400bfe19abfe 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
>   #include <sys/mman.h>
>   #include <net/if.h>
>   #include <poll.h>
> +#include <time.h>

>   #include "xdp_metadata.h"

> @@ -134,14 +135,47 @@ static void refill_rx(struct xsk *xsk, __u64 addr)
>   	}
>   }

> -static void verify_xdp_metadata(void *data)
> +#define NANOSEC_PER_SEC 1000000000 /* 10^9 */
> +static __u64 gettime(clockid_t clock_id)
> +{
> +	struct timespec t;
> +	int res;
> +
> +	/* See man clock_gettime(2) for type of clock_id's */
> +	res = clock_gettime(clock_id, &t);
> +
> +	if (res < 0)
> +		error(res, errno, "Error with clock_gettime()");
> +
> +	return (__u64) t.tv_sec * NANOSEC_PER_SEC + t.tv_nsec;
> +}
> +
> +static void verify_xdp_metadata(void *data, clockid_t clock_id)
>   {
>   	struct xdp_meta *meta;

>   	meta = data - sizeof(*meta);

> -	printf("rx_timestamp: %llu\n", meta->rx_timestamp);
>   	printf("rx_hash: %u\n", meta->rx_hash);
> +	printf("rx_timestamp:  %llu (sec:%0.4f)\n", meta->rx_timestamp,
> +	       (double)meta->rx_timestamp / NANOSEC_PER_SEC);
> +	if (meta->rx_timestamp) {
> +		__u64 usr_clock = gettime(clock_id);
> +		__u64 xdp_clock = meta->xdp_timestamp;
> +		__s64 delta_X = xdp_clock - meta->rx_timestamp;
> +		__s64 delta_X2U = usr_clock - xdp_clock;
> +
> +		printf("XDP RX-time:   %llu (sec:%0.4f) delta sec:%0.4f (%0.3f  
> usec)\n",
> +		       xdp_clock, (double)xdp_clock / NANOSEC_PER_SEC,
> +		       (double)delta_X / NANOSEC_PER_SEC,
> +		       (double)delta_X / 1000);
> +
> +		printf("AF_XDP time:   %llu (sec:%0.4f) delta sec:%0.4f (%0.3f  
> usec)\n",
> +		       usr_clock, (double)usr_clock / NANOSEC_PER_SEC,
> +		       (double)delta_X2U / NANOSEC_PER_SEC,
> +		       (double)delta_X2U / 1000);
> +	}
> +
>   }

>   static void verify_skb_metadata(int fd)
> @@ -189,7 +223,7 @@ static void verify_skb_metadata(int fd)
>   	printf("skb hwtstamp is not found!\n");
>   }

> -static int verify_metadata(struct xsk *rx_xsk, int rxq, int server_fd)
> +static int verify_metadata(struct xsk *rx_xsk, int rxq, int server_fd,  
> clockid_t clock_id)
>   {
>   	const struct xdp_desc *rx_desc;
>   	struct pollfd fds[rxq + 1];
> @@ -237,7 +271,8 @@ static int verify_metadata(struct xsk *rx_xsk, int  
> rxq, int server_fd)
>   			addr = xsk_umem__add_offset_to_addr(rx_desc->addr);
>   			printf("%p: rx_desc[%u]->addr=%llx addr=%llx comp_addr=%llx\n",
>   			       xsk, idx, rx_desc->addr, addr, comp_addr);
> -			verify_xdp_metadata(xsk_umem__get_data(xsk->umem_area, addr));
> +			verify_xdp_metadata(xsk_umem__get_data(xsk->umem_area, addr),
> +					    clock_id);
>   			xsk_ring_cons__release(&xsk->rx, 1);
>   			refill_rx(xsk, comp_addr);
>   		}
> @@ -364,6 +399,7 @@ static void timestamping_enable(int fd, int val)

>   int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>   {
> +	clockid_t clock_id = CLOCK_TAI;
>   	int server_fd = -1;
>   	int ret;
>   	int i;
> @@ -437,7 +473,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>   		error(1, -ret, "bpf_xdp_attach");

>   	signal(SIGINT, handle_signal);
> -	ret = verify_metadata(rx_xsk, rxq, server_fd);
> +	ret = verify_metadata(rx_xsk, rxq, server_fd, clock_id);
>   	close(server_fd);
>   	cleanup();
>   	if (ret)
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_metadata.h  
> b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_metadata.h
> index f6780fbb0a21..260345b2c6f1 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_metadata.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_metadata.h
> @@ -11,5 +11,6 @@

>   struct xdp_meta {
>   	__u64 rx_timestamp;
> +	__u64 xdp_timestamp;
>   	__u32 rx_hash;
>   };



  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-17 21:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-17 14:33 [xdp-hints] [PATCH bpf-next V1 0/7] XDP-hints kfuncs for Intel driver igc Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2023-03-17 14:33 ` [xdp-hints] [PATCH bpf-next V1 1/7] xdp: bpf_xdp_metadata use EOPNOTSUPP for no driver support Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2023-03-17 21:21   ` [xdp-hints] " Stanislav Fomichev
2023-03-20 18:42     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2023-03-21 12:24       ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2023-03-21 13:48         ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2023-03-17 14:33 ` [xdp-hints] [PATCH bpf-next V1 2/7] igc: enable and fix RX hash usage by netstack Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2023-03-17 14:33 ` [xdp-hints] [PATCH bpf-next V1 3/7] selftests/bpf: xdp_hw_metadata track more timestamps Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2023-03-17 21:09   ` Stanislav Fomichev [this message]
2023-03-21 13:29     ` [xdp-hints] " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2023-03-17 14:33 ` [xdp-hints] [PATCH bpf-next V1 4/7] selftests/bpf: xdp_hw_metadata RX hash return code info Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2023-03-17 21:13   ` [xdp-hints] " Stanislav Fomichev
2023-03-21 13:32     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2023-03-21 18:45       ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-03-22 15:57         ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2023-03-17 14:33 ` [xdp-hints] [PATCH bpf-next V1 5/7] igc: add igc_xdp_buff wrapper for xdp_buff in driver Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2023-03-17 14:33 ` [xdp-hints] [PATCH bpf-next V1 6/7] igc: add XDP hints kfuncs for RX timestamp Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2023-03-17 14:33 ` [xdp-hints] [PATCH bpf-next V1 7/7] igc: add XDP hints kfuncs for RX hash Jesper Dangaard Brouer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.xdp-project.net/postorius/lists/xdp-hints.xdp-project.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZBTW+NP1pLPlXRqa@google.com \
    --to=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=alexandr.lobakin@intel.com \
    --cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=boon.leong.ong@intel.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=larysa.zaremba@intel.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xdp-hints@xdp-project.net \
    --cc=yoong.siang.song@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox