XDP hardware hints discussion mail archive
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stanislav Fomichev <stfomichev@gmail.com>
To: Song Yoong Siang <yoong.siang.song@intel.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
	Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
	Florian Bezdeka <florian.bezdeka@siemens.com>,
	Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@gmail.com>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Bjorn Topel <bjorn@kernel.org>,
	Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>,
	Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>,
	Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	Joe Damato <jdamato@fastly.com>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>,
	Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>,
	Daniel Jurgens <danielj@nvidia.com>,
	Amritha Nambiar <amritha.nambiar@intel.com>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>,
	Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
	Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
	Jose Abreu <joabreu@synopsys.com>,
	Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
	Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
	Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, xdp-hints@xdp-project.net
Subject: [xdp-hints] Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 2/4] selftests/bpf: Add Launch Time request to xdp_hw_metadata
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2025 08:57:35 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Z31c_3j9MEP7Z3bd@mini-arch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250106135638.9719-1-yoong.siang.song@intel.com>

On 01/06, Song Yoong Siang wrote:
> Add Launch Time hw offload request to xdp_hw_metadata. User can configure
> the delta of launch time to HW RX-time by using "-l" argument. The default
> delta is 100,000,000 nanosecond.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Song Yoong Siang <yoong.siang.song@intel.com>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c
> index 6f7b15d6c6ed..795c1d14e02d 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdp_hw_metadata.c
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
>   * - UDP 9091 packets trigger TX reply
>   * - TX HW timestamp is requested and reported back upon completion
>   * - TX checksum is requested
> + * - TX launch time HW offload is requested for transmission
>   */
>  
>  #include <test_progs.h>
> @@ -64,6 +65,8 @@ int rxq;
>  bool skip_tx;
>  __u64 last_hw_rx_timestamp;
>  __u64 last_xdp_rx_timestamp;
> +__u64 last_launch_time;
> +__u64 launch_time_delta_to_hw_rx_timestamp = 100000000; /* 0.1 second */
>  
>  void test__fail(void) { /* for network_helpers.c */ }
>  
> @@ -298,6 +301,8 @@ static bool complete_tx(struct xsk *xsk, clockid_t clock_id)
>  	if (meta->completion.tx_timestamp) {
>  		__u64 ref_tstamp = gettime(clock_id);
>  
> +		print_tstamp_delta("HW Launch-time", "HW TX-complete-time",
> +				   last_launch_time, meta->completion.tx_timestamp);
>  		print_tstamp_delta("HW TX-complete-time", "User TX-complete-time",
>  				   meta->completion.tx_timestamp, ref_tstamp);
>  		print_tstamp_delta("XDP RX-time", "User TX-complete-time",
> @@ -395,6 +400,14 @@ static void ping_pong(struct xsk *xsk, void *rx_packet, clockid_t clock_id)
>  	       xsk, ntohs(udph->check), ntohs(want_csum),
>  	       meta->request.csum_start, meta->request.csum_offset);
>  
> +	/* Set the value of launch time */
> +	meta->flags |= XDP_TXMD_FLAGS_LAUNCH_TIME;
> +	meta->request.launch_time = last_hw_rx_timestamp +
> +				    launch_time_delta_to_hw_rx_timestamp;
> +	last_launch_time = meta->request.launch_time;
> +	print_tstamp_delta("HW RX-time", "HW Launch-time", last_hw_rx_timestamp,
> +			   meta->request.launch_time);
> +
>  	memcpy(data, rx_packet, len); /* don't share umem chunk for simplicity */
>  	tx_desc->options |= XDP_TX_METADATA;
>  	tx_desc->len = len;
> @@ -402,10 +415,14 @@ static void ping_pong(struct xsk *xsk, void *rx_packet, clockid_t clock_id)
>  	xsk_ring_prod__submit(&xsk->tx, 1);
>  }
>  
> +#define SLEEP_PER_ITERATION_IN_US 10
> +#define SLEEP_PER_ITERATION_IN_NS (SLEEP_PER_ITERATION_IN_US * 1000)
> +#define MAX_ITERATION(x) (((x) / SLEEP_PER_ITERATION_IN_NS) + 500)
>  static int verify_metadata(struct xsk *rx_xsk, int rxq, int server_fd, clockid_t clock_id)
>  {
>  	const struct xdp_desc *rx_desc;
>  	struct pollfd fds[rxq + 1];
> +	int max_iterations;
>  	__u64 comp_addr;
>  	__u64 addr;
>  	__u32 idx = 0;
> @@ -418,6 +435,9 @@ static int verify_metadata(struct xsk *rx_xsk, int rxq, int server_fd, clockid_t
>  		fds[i].revents = 0;
>  	}
>  
> +	/* Calculate max iterations to wait for transmit completion */
> +	max_iterations = MAX_ITERATION(launch_time_delta_to_hw_rx_timestamp);
> +
>  	fds[rxq].fd = server_fd;
>  	fds[rxq].events = POLLIN;
>  	fds[rxq].revents = 0;
> @@ -477,10 +497,10 @@ static int verify_metadata(struct xsk *rx_xsk, int rxq, int server_fd, clockid_t
>  					if (ret)
>  						printf("kick_tx ret=%d\n", ret);
>  

[..]

> -					for (int j = 0; j < 500; j++) {
> +					for (int j = 0; j < max_iterations; j++) {
>  						if (complete_tx(xsk, clock_id))
>  							break;
> -						usleep(10);
> +						usleep(SLEEP_PER_ITERATION_IN_US);

nit: instead of doing MAX_ITERATION/max_iterations, can we simplify this
to the following?

static u64 now(void)
{
	clock_gettime(...);
	return ts.tv_sec * NSEC_PER_SEC + ts.tv_nsec;
}

/* wait 5 seconds + cover launch time */
deadline = now() + 5 * NSEC_PER_SEC + launch_time_delta_to_hw_rx_timestamp;
while (true) {
	if (complete_tx())
		break;
	if (now() >= deadline)
		break;
	usleep(10);
}

It is a bit more readable than converting time to wait to the
iterations..

  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-07 16:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-06 13:56 [xdp-hints] " Song Yoong Siang
2025-01-07 16:57 ` Stanislav Fomichev [this message]
2025-01-09  7:08   ` [xdp-hints] " Song, Yoong Siang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.xdp-project.net/postorius/lists/xdp-hints.xdp-project.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Z31c_3j9MEP7Z3bd@mini-arch \
    --to=stfomichev@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
    --cc=almasrymina@google.com \
    --cc=amritha.nambiar@intel.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=danielj@nvidia.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=donald.hunter@gmail.com \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=florian.bezdeka@siemens.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=hawk@kernel.org \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=jdamato@fastly.com \
    --cc=joabreu@synopsys.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=jonathan.lemon@gmail.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
    --cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
    --cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
    --cc=mykolal@fb.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    --cc=xdp-hints@xdp-project.net \
    --cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    --cc=yoong.siang.song@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox