From: "Zulkifli, Muhammad Husaini" <muhammad.husaini.zulkifli@intel.com>
To: "Song, Yoong Siang" <yoong.siang.song@intel.com>,
"Bezdeka, Florian" <florian.bezdeka@siemens.com>,
"Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
"Nguyen, Anthony L" <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@kernel.org>,
"John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
"Fijalkowski, Maciej" <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>,
Vedang Patel <vedang.patel@intel.com>,
"Joseph, Jithu" <jithu.joseph@intel.com>,
Andre Guedes <andre.guedes@intel.com>,
"Brouer, Jesper" <brouer@redhat.com>,
"Stanislav Fomichev" <sdf@google.com>,
"Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>,
David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
Cc: "xdp-hints@xdp-project.net" <xdp-hints@xdp-project.net>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
"intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org"
<intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>,
"bpf@vger.kernel.org" <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [xdp-hints] Re: [PATCH net v3 1/1] igc: read before write to SRRCTL register
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2023 02:53:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <SJ1PR11MB618095F79E53B077E922F900B89C9@SJ1PR11MB6180.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <PH0PR11MB58306BDB63286338EABAF61AD89F9@PH0PR11MB5830.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Hi Florian,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan-bounces@osuosl.org> On Behalf Of
> Song, Yoong Siang
> Sent: Sunday, 16 April, 2023 10:19 AM
> To: Bezdeka, Florian <florian.bezdeka@siemens.com>; Brandeburg, Jesse
> <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>; Nguyen, Anthony L
> <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>; David S . Miller <davem@davemloft.net>;
> Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>; Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>;
> Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>; Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>;
> Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>; Jesper Dangaard Brouer
> <hawk@kernel.org>; John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>;
> Fijalkowski, Maciej <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>; Vedang Patel
> <vedang.patel@intel.com>; Joseph, Jithu <jithu.joseph@intel.com>; Andre
> Guedes <andre.guedes@intel.com>; Brouer, Jesper <brouer@redhat.com>;
> Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>; Keller, Jacob E
> <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>; David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
> Cc: xdp-hints@xdp-project.net; netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org; stable@vger.kernel.org; intel-wired-
> lan@lists.osuosl.org; bpf@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net v3 1/1] igc: read before write to
> SRRCTL register
>
> On Saturday, April 15, 2023 5:20 PM, Florian Bezdeka
> <florian.bezdeka@siemens.com> wrote:
> >On 14.04.23 17:49, Song Yoong Siang wrote:
> >> igc_configure_rx_ring() function will be called as part of XDP
> >> program setup. If Rx hardware timestamp is enabled prio to XDP
> >> program setup, this timestamp enablement will be overwritten when
> >> buffer size is written into SRRCTL register.
> >>
> >
> >Hi all,
> >
> >I'm actually searching for the root cause of a similar problem (RX
> >timestamp lost) that I can reproduce here, but the setup is slightly
> different. The setup:
> >
> >- igc driver
> >- i225/226 network card
> >- When starting to transmit frames using XDP with zero copy enabled
> > another application (ptp4l) complains about missing RX timestamps
> >- Loading the XDP program has already been removed (not needed for
> > TX only)
> >- ptp4l is using the traditional socket API
> >- The RX timestamps seem to come back once we stop sending frames
> > using XDP
> >
> >The "zero copy support" enabled part is important. If ZC support is not
> >requested everything works fine.
> >
> >Any ideas?
Are you observing similar issue like below?
ptp4l: timed out while polling for tx timestamp
ptp4l: increasing tx_timestamp_timeout may correct this issue
If yes, only TXSTAMPO register is used for both PTP and non-PTP packets in
the current driver code. There is a possibility that the time stamp
for a PTP packet will be lost when there is a lot of traffic when multiple
applications request for hardware transmission timestamps.
Few months back, I submitted a patch series to enable the DMA
Timestamp for non-ptp packet which can resolve the above issue.
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20221018010733.4765-1-muhammad.husaini.zulkifli@intel.com/T/
Will continuing back the activity soon.
But you might want to try with series submitted by Vinicius as well.
This patch series add support for four sets of timestamping register.
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/intel-wired-lan/patch/20230228054534.1093483-2-vinicius.gomes@intel.com/
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/intel-wired-lan/patch/20230228054534.1093483-3-vinicius.gomes@intel.com/
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/intel-wired-lan/patch/20230228054534.1093483-4-vinicius.gomes@intel.com/
Would it be possible for you to try any of the above patch series
and see if that fixes your problem?
Thanks,
Husaini
> >
> >Best regards,
> >Florian
> >
>
> Hi Florian,
>
> You means this patch does not help on your issue?
> Need to understand more on the setup and behavior to tell.
> Are ptp4l and XDP ZC Tx apps running on same queue or separate queue?
> I suggest you to run " sudo hwstamp_ctl -i eth0 -r 1 " multiple times in the
> middle to check the behavior.
>
> Thanks & Regards
> Siang
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-wired-lan mailing list
> Intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
> https://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-wired-lan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-17 2:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-14 15:49 [xdp-hints] " Song Yoong Siang
2023-04-14 20:05 ` [xdp-hints] " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2023-04-17 14:24 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2023-04-18 9:31 ` Florian Bezdeka
2023-04-15 9:19 ` Florian Bezdeka
2023-04-16 2:19 ` Song, Yoong Siang
2023-04-17 2:53 ` Zulkifli, Muhammad Husaini [this message]
2023-04-17 18:50 ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-04-30 5:05 ` [xdp-hints] Re: [Intel-wired-lan] " naamax.meir
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.xdp-project.net/postorius/lists/xdp-hints.xdp-project.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=SJ1PR11MB618095F79E53B077E922F900B89C9@SJ1PR11MB6180.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=muhammad.husaini.zulkifli@intel.com \
--cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
--cc=andre.guedes@intel.com \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=florian.bezdeka@siemens.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=jithu.joseph@intel.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vedang.patel@intel.com \
--cc=xdp-hints@xdp-project.net \
--cc=yoong.siang.song@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox