[xdp-hints] Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 18/20] selftests/bpf: Use AF_INET for TX in xdp_metadata

[Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>]

On Thu, Jul 6, 2023 at 7:15 AM Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 05, 2023 at 10:39:35AM -0700, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > On 07/03, Larysa Zaremba wrote:
> > > The easiest way to simulate stripped VLAN tag in veth is to send a packet
> > > from VLAN interface, attached to veth. Unfortunately, this approach is
> > > incompatible with AF_XDP on TX side, because VLAN interfaces do not have
> > > such feature.
> > >
> > > Replace AF_XDP packet generation with sending the same datagram via
> > > AF_INET socket.
> > >
> > > This does not change the packet contents or hints values with one notable
> > > exception: rx_hash_type, which previously was expected to be 0, now is
> > > expected be at least XDP_RSS_TYPE_L4.
> > >
> > > Also, usage of AF_INET requires a little more complicated namespace setup,
> > > therefore open_netns() helper function is divided into smaller reusable
> > > pieces.
> >
> > Ack, it's probably OK for now, but, FYI, I'm trying to extend this part
> > with TX metadata:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230621170244.1283336-10-sdf@google.com/
> >
> > So probably long-term I'll switch it back to AF_XDP but will add
> > support for requesting vlan TX "offload" from the veth.
> >
>
> My bad for not reading your series. Amazing work as always!
>
> So, 'requesting vlan TX "offload"' with new hints capabilities? This would be
> pretty neat.
>
> But you think AF_INET TX is worth keeping for now, until TX hints are mature?
>
> > > Signed-off-by: Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/network_helpers.c |  37 +++-
> > >  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/network_helpers.h |   3 +
> > >  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_metadata.c   | 175 +++++++-----------
> > >  3 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 117 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/network_helpers.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/network_helpers.c
> > > index a105c0cd008a..19463230ece5 100644
> > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/network_helpers.c
> > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/network_helpers.c
> > > @@ -386,28 +386,51 @@ char *ping_command(int family)
> > >     return "ping";
> > >  }
> > >
> > > +int get_cur_netns(void)
> > > +{
> > > +   int nsfd;
> > > +
> > > +   nsfd = open("/proc/self/ns/net", O_RDONLY);
> > > +   ASSERT_GE(nsfd, 0, "open /proc/self/ns/net");
> > > +   return nsfd;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +int get_netns(const char *name)
> > > +{
> > > +   char nspath[PATH_MAX];
> > > +   int nsfd;
> > > +
> > > +   snprintf(nspath, sizeof(nspath), "%s/%s", "/var/run/netns", name);
> > > +   nsfd = open(nspath, O_RDONLY | O_CLOEXEC);
> > > +   ASSERT_GE(nsfd, 0, "open /proc/self/ns/net");
> > > +   return nsfd;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +int set_netns(int netns_fd)
> > > +{
> > > +   return setns(netns_fd, CLONE_NEWNET);
> > > +}
> >
> > We have open_netns/close_netns in network_helpers.h that provide similar
> > functionality, let's use them instead?
> >
>
> I have divided open_netns() into smaller pieces (see below), because the code I
> have added into xdp_metadata looked better with those smaller pieces (I had to
> switch namespace several times).

Forgot to reply to this part. I missed the fact that you're extending
network_helpers, sorry.
But why do we need extra namespaces at all?