From: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
To: Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@intel.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org,
yhs@fb.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org,
haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>,
Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>,
Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@intel.com>,
Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@gmail.com>,
Maryam Tahhan <mtahhan@redhat.com>,
xdp-hints@xdp-project.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [xdp-hints] Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/8] bpf: XDP metadata RX kfuncs
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 12:17:39 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKH8qBstSJEN5wvcPAcrnD0at8fNeyLNwijiT4wv=wD9eAd1TA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKH8qBtseOmsWmeprdRsvz0T=vAObYE_CpsYQOX0CsLR_iXNFA@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 11:06 AM Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 9:38 AM Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 10:25:46AM -0800, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> >
> > > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> > > index 9528a066cfa5..315876fa9d30 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> > > @@ -15171,6 +15171,25 @@ static int fixup_call_args(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
> > > return err;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static int fixup_xdp_kfunc_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 func_id)
> > > +{
> > > + struct bpf_prog_aux *aux = env->prog->aux;
> > > + void *resolved = NULL;
> >
> > First I would like to say I really like the kfunc hints impementation.
> >
> > I am currently trying to test possible performace benefits of the unrolled
> > version in the ice driver. I was working on top of the RFC v2,
> > when I noticed a problem that also persists in this newer version.
> >
> > For debugging purposes, I have put the following logs in this place in code.
> >
> > printk(KERN_ERR "func_id=%u\n", func_id);
> > printk(KERN_ERR "XDP_METADATA_KFUNC_RX_TIMESTAMP_SUPPORTED=%u\n",
> > xdp_metadata_kfunc_id(XDP_METADATA_KFUNC_RX_TIMESTAMP_SUPPORTED));
> > printk(KERN_ERR "XDP_METADATA_KFUNC_RX_TIMESTAMP=%u\n",
> > xdp_metadata_kfunc_id(XDP_METADATA_KFUNC_RX_TIMESTAMP));
> > printk(KERN_ERR "XDP_METADATA_KFUNC_RX_HASH_SUPPORTED=%u\n",
> > xdp_metadata_kfunc_id(XDP_METADATA_KFUNC_RX_HASH_SUPPORTED));
> > printk(KERN_ERR "XDP_METADATA_KFUNC_RX_HASH=%u\n",
> > xdp_metadata_kfunc_id(XDP_METADATA_KFUNC_RX_HASH));
> >
> > Loading the program, which uses bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_timestamp_supported()
> > and bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_timestamp(), has resulted in such messages:
> >
> > [ 412.611888] func_id=108131
> > [ 412.611891] XDP_METADATA_KFUNC_RX_TIMESTAMP_SUPPORTED=108126
> > [ 412.611892] XDP_METADATA_KFUNC_RX_TIMESTAMP=108128
> > [ 412.611892] XDP_METADATA_KFUNC_RX_HASH_SUPPORTED=108130
> > [ 412.611893] XDP_METADATA_KFUNC_RX_HASH=108131
> > [ 412.611894] func_id=108130
> > [ 412.611894] XDP_METADATA_KFUNC_RX_TIMESTAMP_SUPPORTED=108126
> > [ 412.611895] XDP_METADATA_KFUNC_RX_TIMESTAMP=108128
> > [ 412.611895] XDP_METADATA_KFUNC_RX_HASH_SUPPORTED=108130
> > [ 412.611895] XDP_METADATA_KFUNC_RX_HASH=108131
> >
> > As you can see, I've got 108131 and 108130 IDs in program,
> > while 108126 and 108128 would be more reasonable.
> > It's hard to proceed with the implementation, when IDs cannot be sustainably
> > compared.
>
> Thanks for the report!
> Toke has reported a similar issue in [0], have you tried his patch?
> I've also tried to address it in v3 [1], could you retry on top of it?
> I'll try to insert your printk in my local build to see what happens
> with btf ids on my side. Will get back to you..
>
> 0: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/87mt8e2a69.fsf@toke.dk/
> 1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221129193452.3448944-3-sdf@google.com/T/#u
Nope, even if I go back to v2, I still can't reproduce locally.
Somehow in my setup they are sorted properly :-/
Would appreciate it if you can test the v3 patch and confirm whether
it's fixed on your side or not.
> > Furthermore, dumped vmlinux BTF shows the IDs is in the exactly reversed
> > order:
> >
> > [108126] FUNC 'bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_hash' type_id=108125 linkage=static
> > [108128] FUNC 'bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_hash_supported' type_id=108127 linkage=static
> > [108130] FUNC 'bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_timestamp' type_id=108129 linkage=static
> > [108131] FUNC 'bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_timestamp_supported' type_id=108127 linkage=static
> >
> > > +
> > > + if (func_id == xdp_metadata_kfunc_id(XDP_METADATA_KFUNC_RX_TIMESTAMP_SUPPORTED))
> > > + resolved = aux->xdp_netdev->netdev_ops->ndo_xdp_rx_timestamp_supported;
> > > + else if (func_id == xdp_metadata_kfunc_id(XDP_METADATA_KFUNC_RX_TIMESTAMP))
> > > + resolved = aux->xdp_netdev->netdev_ops->ndo_xdp_rx_timestamp;
> > > + else if (func_id == xdp_metadata_kfunc_id(XDP_METADATA_KFUNC_RX_HASH_SUPPORTED))
> > > + resolved = aux->xdp_netdev->netdev_ops->ndo_xdp_rx_hash_supported;
> > > + else if (func_id == xdp_metadata_kfunc_id(XDP_METADATA_KFUNC_RX_HASH))
> > > + resolved = aux->xdp_netdev->netdev_ops->ndo_xdp_rx_hash;
> > > +
> > > + if (resolved)
> > > + return BPF_CALL_IMM(resolved);
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> >
> > My working tree (based on this version) is available on github [0]. Situation
> > is also described in the last commit message.
> > I would be great, if you could check, whether this behaviour can be reproduced
> > on your setup.
> >
> > [0] https://github.com/walking-machine/linux/tree/hints-v2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-30 20:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-21 18:25 [xdp-hints] [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/8] xdp: hints via kfuncs Stanislav Fomichev
2022-11-21 18:25 ` [xdp-hints] [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/8] bpf: Document XDP RX metadata Stanislav Fomichev
2022-11-21 18:25 ` [xdp-hints] [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/8] bpf: XDP metadata RX kfuncs Stanislav Fomichev
2022-11-21 23:31 ` [xdp-hints] " kernel test robot
2022-11-23 6:34 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-11-23 18:43 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-11-23 14:24 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2022-11-23 18:43 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-11-24 2:23 ` kernel test robot
2022-11-24 12:19 ` kernel test robot
2022-11-24 13:09 ` kernel test robot
2022-11-25 17:53 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2022-11-28 18:53 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-11-28 19:21 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-11-28 22:25 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2022-11-28 22:10 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2022-11-30 17:24 ` Larysa Zaremba
2022-11-30 19:06 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-11-30 20:17 ` Stanislav Fomichev [this message]
2022-12-01 13:52 ` Larysa Zaremba
2022-12-01 17:14 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-11-21 18:25 ` [xdp-hints] [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/8] veth: Introduce veth_xdp_buff wrapper for xdp_buff Stanislav Fomichev
2022-11-21 18:25 ` [xdp-hints] [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/8] veth: Support RX XDP metadata Stanislav Fomichev
2022-11-21 18:25 ` [xdp-hints] [PATCH bpf-next v2 5/8] selftests/bpf: Verify xdp_metadata xdp->af_xdp path Stanislav Fomichev
2022-11-29 10:06 ` [xdp-hints] " Anton Protopopov
2022-11-29 18:52 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-11-21 18:25 ` [xdp-hints] [PATCH bpf-next v2 6/8] mlx4: Introduce mlx4_xdp_buff wrapper for xdp_buff Stanislav Fomichev
2022-11-22 13:49 ` [xdp-hints] " Tariq Toukan
2022-11-22 18:08 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-11-23 14:33 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2022-11-23 18:26 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-11-23 19:14 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-11-23 19:52 ` sdf
2022-11-23 21:54 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2022-11-23 21:55 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2022-11-24 1:47 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-11-24 14:39 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2022-11-24 15:17 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2022-11-24 16:11 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2022-11-25 0:36 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2022-11-28 21:58 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-11-28 22:11 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2022-11-21 18:25 ` [xdp-hints] [PATCH bpf-next v2 7/8] mxl4: Support RX XDP metadata Stanislav Fomichev
2022-11-22 13:50 ` [xdp-hints] " Tariq Toukan
2022-11-22 18:08 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-11-21 18:25 ` [xdp-hints] [PATCH bpf-next v2 8/8] selftests/bpf: Simple program to dump XDP RX metadata Stanislav Fomichev
2022-11-23 14:26 ` [xdp-hints] " Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2022-11-23 18:29 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-11-23 19:17 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-11-23 19:54 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-11-23 14:46 ` [xdp-hints] [PATCH bpf-next 1/2] xdp: Add drv_priv pointer to struct xdp_buff Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2022-11-23 14:46 ` [xdp-hints] [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] mlx5: Support XDP RX metadata Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2022-11-23 22:29 ` [xdp-hints] " Saeed Mahameed
2022-11-23 22:44 ` Stanislav Fomichev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.xdp-project.net/postorius/lists/xdp-hints.xdp-project.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAKH8qBstSJEN5wvcPAcrnD0at8fNeyLNwijiT4wv=wD9eAd1TA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=sdf@google.com \
--cc=alexandr.lobakin@intel.com \
--cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=larysa.zaremba@intel.com \
--cc=magnus.karlsson@gmail.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mtahhan@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
--cc=xdp-hints@xdp-project.net \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox