From: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
To: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org,
yhs@fb.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org,
haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>,
Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>,
Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@intel.com>,
Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@gmail.com>,
Maryam Tahhan <mtahhan@redhat.com>,
xdp-hints@xdp-project.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [xdp-hints] Re: [PATCH bpf-next 05/11] veth: Support rx timestamp metadata for xdp
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2022 20:09:24 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKH8qBsg4aoFuiajuXmRN3VPKYVJZ-Z5wGzBy9pH3pV5RKCDzQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8735ajet05.fsf@toke.dk>
On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 2:46 PM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> writes:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 8:17 AM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> writes:
> >>
> >> > The goal is to enable end-to-end testing of the metadata
> >> > for AF_XDP. Current rx_timestamp kfunc returns current
> >> > time which should be enough to exercise this new functionality.
> >> >
> >> > Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
> >> > Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
> >> > Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
> >> > Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> >> > Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
> >> > Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
> >> > Cc: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
> >> > Cc: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@intel.com>
> >> > Cc: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@gmail.com>
> >> > Cc: Maryam Tahhan <mtahhan@redhat.com>
> >> > Cc: xdp-hints@xdp-project.net
> >> > Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
> >> > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
> >> > ---
> >> > drivers/net/veth.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> >> > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/drivers/net/veth.c b/drivers/net/veth.c
> >> > index 2a4592780141..c626580a2294 100644
> >> > --- a/drivers/net/veth.c
> >> > +++ b/drivers/net/veth.c
> >> > @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
> >> > #include <linux/filter.h>
> >> > #include <linux/ptr_ring.h>
> >> > #include <linux/bpf_trace.h>
> >> > +#include <linux/bpf_patch.h>
> >> > #include <linux/net_tstamp.h>
> >> >
> >> > #define DRV_NAME "veth"
> >> > @@ -1659,6 +1660,18 @@ static int veth_xdp(struct net_device *dev, struct netdev_bpf *xdp)
> >> > }
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> > +static void veth_unroll_kfunc(const struct bpf_prog *prog, u32 func_id,
> >> > + struct bpf_patch *patch)
> >> > +{
> >> > + if (func_id == xdp_metadata_kfunc_id(XDP_METADATA_KFUNC_RX_TIMESTAMP_SUPPORTED)) {
> >> > + /* return true; */
> >> > + bpf_patch_append(patch, BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1));
> >> > + } else if (func_id == xdp_metadata_kfunc_id(XDP_METADATA_KFUNC_RX_TIMESTAMP)) {
> >> > + /* return ktime_get_mono_fast_ns(); */
> >> > + bpf_patch_append(patch, BPF_EMIT_CALL(ktime_get_mono_fast_ns));
> >> > + }
> >> > +}
> >>
> >> So these look reasonable enough, but would be good to see some examples
> >> of kfunc implementations that don't just BPF_CALL to a kernel function
> >> (with those helper wrappers we were discussing before).
> >
> > Let's maybe add them if/when needed as we add more metadata support?
> > xdp_metadata_export_to_skb has an example, and rfc 1/2 have more
> > examples, so it shouldn't be a problem to resurrect them back at some
> > point?
>
> Well, the reason I asked for them is that I think having to maintain the
> BPF code generation in the drivers is probably the biggest drawback of
> the kfunc approach, so it would be good to be relatively sure that we
> can manage that complexity (via helpers) before we commit to this :)
Right, and I've added a bunch of examples in v2 rfc so we can judge
whether that complexity is manageable or not :-)
Do you want me to add those wrappers you've back without any real users?
Because I had to remove my veth tstamp accessors due to John/Jesper
objections; I can maybe bring some of this back gated by some
static_branch to avoid the fastpath cost?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-16 4:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-15 3:01 [xdp-hints] [PATCH bpf-next 00/11] xdp: hints via kfuncs Stanislav Fomichev
2022-11-15 3:02 ` [xdp-hints] [PATCH bpf-next 02/11] bpf: Introduce bpf_patch Stanislav Fomichev
2022-11-15 3:02 ` [xdp-hints] [PATCH bpf-next 03/11] bpf: Support inlined/unrolled kfuncs for xdp metadata Stanislav Fomichev
2022-11-15 16:16 ` [xdp-hints] " Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2022-11-15 18:37 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-11-16 20:42 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-11-16 20:53 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-11-15 3:02 ` [xdp-hints] [PATCH bpf-next 05/11] veth: Support rx timestamp metadata for xdp Stanislav Fomichev
2022-11-15 16:17 ` [xdp-hints] " Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2022-11-15 18:37 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-11-15 22:46 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2022-11-16 4:09 ` Stanislav Fomichev [this message]
2022-11-16 6:38 ` John Fastabend
2022-11-16 7:47 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-11-16 10:08 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2022-11-16 18:20 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-11-16 19:03 ` John Fastabend
2022-11-16 20:50 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-11-16 23:47 ` John Fastabend
2022-11-17 0:19 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-11-17 2:17 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-11-17 2:53 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-11-17 2:59 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-11-17 4:18 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-11-17 6:55 ` John Fastabend
2022-11-17 17:51 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-11-17 19:47 ` John Fastabend
2022-11-17 20:17 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-11-17 11:32 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2022-11-17 16:59 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-11-17 17:52 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-11-17 23:46 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2022-11-18 0:02 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-11-18 0:29 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2022-11-17 10:27 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2022-11-15 3:02 ` [xdp-hints] [PATCH bpf-next 06/11] xdp: Carry over xdp metadata into skb context Stanislav Fomichev
2022-11-15 23:20 ` [xdp-hints] " Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2022-11-16 3:49 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-11-16 9:30 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2022-11-16 4:40 ` kernel test robot
2022-11-16 7:04 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-11-16 9:48 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2022-11-16 20:51 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-11-16 20:51 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-11-16 8:22 ` kernel test robot
2022-11-16 9:03 ` kernel test robot
2022-11-16 13:46 ` kernel test robot
2022-11-16 21:12 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-11-16 21:49 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-11-18 14:05 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2022-11-18 18:18 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-11-19 12:31 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2022-11-21 17:53 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-11-21 18:47 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-11-21 19:41 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-11-15 3:02 ` [xdp-hints] [PATCH bpf-next 07/11] selftests/bpf: Verify xdp_metadata xdp->af_xdp path Stanislav Fomichev
2022-11-15 3:02 ` [xdp-hints] [PATCH bpf-next 08/11] selftests/bpf: Verify xdp_metadata xdp->skb path Stanislav Fomichev
2022-11-15 3:02 ` [xdp-hints] [PATCH bpf-next 09/11] mlx4: Introduce mlx4_xdp_buff wrapper for xdp_buff Stanislav Fomichev
2022-11-15 3:02 ` [xdp-hints] [PATCH bpf-next 10/11] mxl4: Support rx timestamp metadata for xdp Stanislav Fomichev
2022-11-15 15:54 ` [xdp-hints] Re: [PATCH bpf-next 00/11] xdp: hints via kfuncs Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2022-11-15 18:37 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-11-15 22:31 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2022-11-15 22:54 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2022-11-15 23:13 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.xdp-project.net/postorius/lists/xdp-hints.xdp-project.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAKH8qBsg4aoFuiajuXmRN3VPKYVJZ-Z5wGzBy9pH3pV5RKCDzQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=sdf@google.com \
--cc=alexandr.lobakin@intel.com \
--cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.karlsson@gmail.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mtahhan@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=toke@redhat.com \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
--cc=xdp-hints@xdp-project.net \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox