From: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@redhat.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, brouer@redhat.com, ast@kernel.org,
daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev,
song@kernel.org, yhs@fb.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
kpsingh@kernel.org, haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>,
Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@intel.com>,
Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@gmail.com>,
Maryam Tahhan <mtahhan@redhat.com>,
xdp-hints@xdp-project.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [xdp-hints] Re: [RFC bpf-next 2/5] veth: Support rx timestamp metadata for xdp
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2022 11:46:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKH8qBsPHFy3E94a7VGXXzoKXL9GMnf=ggT8Ne3EO_uCcgajOA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1596dd80-246b-80d0-b482-4248691de68e@redhat.com>
On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 1:40 AM Jesper Dangaard Brouer
<jbrouer@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 27/10/2022 22.00, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> > xskxceiver conveniently setups up veth pairs so it seems logical
> > to use veth as an example for some of the metadata handling.
> >
> > We timestamp skb right when we "receive" it, store its
> > pointer in xdp_buff->priv and generate BPF bytecode to
> > reach it from the BPF program.
> >
> > This largely follows the idea of "store some queue context in
> > the xdp_buff/xdp_frame so the metadata can be reached out
> > from the BPF program".
> >
> > Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>
> > Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> > Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
> > Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
> > Cc: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@intel.com>
> > Cc: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Maryam Tahhan <mtahhan@redhat.com>
> > Cc: xdp-hints@xdp-project.net
> > Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/veth.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/veth.c b/drivers/net/veth.c
> > index 09682ea3354e..35396dd73de0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/veth.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/veth.c
> > @@ -597,6 +597,7 @@ static struct xdp_frame *veth_xdp_rcv_one(struct veth_rq *rq,
> >
> > xdp_convert_frame_to_buff(frame, &xdp);
> > xdp.rxq = &rq->xdp_rxq;
> > + xdp.priv = NULL;
>
> So, why doesn't this supported for normal XDP mode?!?
> e.g. Where veth gets XDP redirected an xdp_frame.
I wanted to have something simple for the demonstration purposes
(hence the re-usage of xskxceiver + veth without redirection).
But also see my cover letter:
Cons:
- forwarding has to be handled explicitly; the BPF programs have to
agree on the metadata layout (IOW, the forwarding program
has to be aware of the final AF_XDP consumer metadata layout)
> My main use case (for veth) is to make NIC hardware hints available to
> containers. Thus, creating a flexible fast-path via XDP-redirect
> directly into containers veth device. (This is e.g. for replacing the
> inflexible SR-IOV approach with SR-IOV net_devices in the container,
> with a more cloud friendly approach).
>
> How can we extend this approach to handle xdp_frame's from different
> net_device's ?
So for this case, your forwarding program will have to call a bunch
of kfuncs and assemble the metadata.
It can also put some info about this metadata format. In theory, it
can even put some external btf-id for the struct that describes the
layout; or it can use some tlv format.
And then the final consumer will have to decide what to do with that metadata.
Or do you want xdp->skb conversion to also be transparently handled?
In this case, the last program will have to convert this to some new
xdp_hints_skb so the kernel can understand it. We might need some
extra helpers to signal those, but seems doable?
> >
> > act = bpf_prog_run_xdp(xdp_prog, &xdp);
> >
> > @@ -820,6 +821,7 @@ static struct sk_buff *veth_xdp_rcv_skb(struct veth_rq *rq,
> >
> > orig_data = xdp.data;
> > orig_data_end = xdp.data_end;
> > + xdp.priv = skb;
> >
>
> So, enabling SKB based path only.
>
> > act = bpf_prog_run_xdp(xdp_prog, &xdp);
> >
> > @@ -936,6 +938,7 @@ static int veth_xdp_rcv(struct veth_rq *rq, int budget,
> > struct sk_buff *skb = ptr;
> >
> > stats->xdp_bytes += skb->len;
> > + __net_timestamp(skb);
> > skb = veth_xdp_rcv_skb(rq, skb, bq, stats);
> > if (skb) {
> > if (skb_shared(skb) || skb_unclone(skb, GFP_ATOMIC))
> > @@ -1595,6 +1598,33 @@ static int veth_xdp(struct net_device *dev, struct netdev_bpf *xdp)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > +static int veth_unroll_kfunc(struct bpf_prog *prog, struct bpf_insn *insn)
> > +{
> > + u32 func_id = insn->imm;
> > +
> > + if (func_id == xdp_metadata_kfunc_id(XDP_METADATA_KFUNC_HAVE_RX_TIMESTAMP)) {
> > + /* return true; */
> > + insn[0] = BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1);
> > + return 1;
> > + } else if (func_id == xdp_metadata_kfunc_id(XDP_METADATA_KFUNC_RX_TIMESTAMP)) {
> > + /* r1 = ((struct xdp_buff *)r1)->priv; [skb] */
> > + insn[0] = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_1,
> > + offsetof(struct xdp_buff, priv));
> > + /* if (r1 == NULL) { */
> > + insn[1] = BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_1, 0, 1);
> > + /* return 0; */
> > + insn[2] = BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0);
> > + /* } else { */
> > + /* return ((struct sk_buff *)r1)->tstamp; */
> > + insn[3] = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
> > + offsetof(struct sk_buff, tstamp));
>
> Just to be clear, this skb->tstamp is a software timestamp, right?
Yes, see above, this is just to showcase how the bpf/af_xdp side will
look. The 1st patch and the last one are the interesting ones. The
rest is boring plumbing we can ignore for now.
> > + /* } */
> > + return 4;
> > + }
>
> I'm slightly concerned with driver developers maintaining BPF-bytecode
> on a per-driver bases, but I can certainly live with this if BPF
> maintainers can.
>
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > static const struct net_device_ops veth_netdev_ops = {
> > .ndo_init = veth_dev_init,
> > .ndo_open = veth_open,
> > @@ -1614,6 +1644,7 @@ static const struct net_device_ops veth_netdev_ops = {
> > .ndo_bpf = veth_xdp,
> > .ndo_xdp_xmit = veth_ndo_xdp_xmit,
> > .ndo_get_peer_dev = veth_peer_dev,
> > + .ndo_unroll_kfunc = veth_unroll_kfunc,
> > };
> >
> > #define VETH_FEATURES (NETIF_F_SG | NETIF_F_FRAGLIST | NETIF_F_HW_CSUM | \
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-28 18:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-27 20:00 [xdp-hints] [RFC bpf-next 0/5] xdp: hints via kfuncs Stanislav Fomichev
2022-10-27 20:00 ` [xdp-hints] [RFC bpf-next 1/5] bpf: Support inlined/unrolled kfuncs for xdp metadata Stanislav Fomichev
2022-10-27 20:00 ` [xdp-hints] [RFC bpf-next 2/5] veth: Support rx timestamp metadata for xdp Stanislav Fomichev
2022-10-28 8:40 ` [xdp-hints] " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2022-10-28 18:46 ` Stanislav Fomichev [this message]
2022-10-27 20:00 ` [xdp-hints] [RFC bpf-next 3/5] libbpf: Pass prog_ifindex via bpf_object_open_opts Stanislav Fomichev
2022-10-27 20:05 ` [xdp-hints] " Andrii Nakryiko
2022-10-27 20:10 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-10-27 20:00 ` [xdp-hints] [RFC bpf-next 4/5] selftests/bpf: Convert xskxceiver to use custom program Stanislav Fomichev
2022-10-27 20:00 ` [xdp-hints] [RFC bpf-next 5/5] selftests/bpf: Test rx_timestamp metadata in xskxceiver Stanislav Fomichev
2022-10-28 6:22 ` [xdp-hints] " Martin KaFai Lau
2022-10-28 10:37 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2022-10-28 18:46 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-10-31 14:20 ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-10-31 14:29 ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-10-31 17:00 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-11-01 13:18 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2022-11-01 20:12 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-11-01 22:23 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2022-10-28 15:58 ` [xdp-hints] Re: [RFC bpf-next 0/5] xdp: hints via kfuncs John Fastabend
2022-10-28 18:04 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-10-28 18:46 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-10-28 23:16 ` John Fastabend
2022-10-29 1:14 ` Jakub Kicinski
2022-10-31 14:10 ` Bezdeka, Florian
2022-10-31 15:28 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2022-10-31 17:00 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-10-31 22:57 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-11-01 1:59 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-11-01 12:52 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2022-11-01 13:43 ` David Ahern
2022-11-01 14:20 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2022-11-01 17:05 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-11-01 20:12 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-11-02 14:06 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2022-11-02 22:01 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2022-11-02 23:10 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-11-03 0:09 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2022-11-03 12:01 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2022-11-03 12:48 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2022-11-03 15:25 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2022-10-31 19:36 ` Yonghong Song
2022-10-31 22:09 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-10-31 22:38 ` Yonghong Song
2022-10-31 22:55 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-11-01 14:23 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2022-11-01 17:31 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-11-01 20:12 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2022-11-01 21:17 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2022-10-31 17:01 ` John Fastabend
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.xdp-project.net/postorius/lists/xdp-hints.xdp-project.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAKH8qBsPHFy3E94a7VGXXzoKXL9GMnf=ggT8Ne3EO_uCcgajOA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=sdf@google.com \
--cc=alexandr.lobakin@intel.com \
--cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=jbrouer@redhat.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.karlsson@gmail.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mtahhan@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
--cc=xdp-hints@xdp-project.net \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox