XDP hardware hints discussion mail archive
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
To: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Cc: bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, "Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
	"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@kernel.org>,
	"Martin KaFai Lau" <martin.lau@linux.dev>,
	"Song Liu" <song@kernel.org>, "Yonghong Song" <yhs@fb.com>,
	"John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	"KP Singh" <kpsingh@kernel.org>, "Hao Luo" <haoluo@google.com>,
	"Jiri Olsa" <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@kernel.org>,
	"Willem de Bruijn" <willemb@google.com>,
	"David Ahern" <dsahern@kernel.org>,
	"Karlsson, Magnus" <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>,
	"Björn Töpel" <bjorn@kernel.org>,
	"Fijalkowski, Maciej" <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>,
	"Jesper Dangaard Brouer" <hawk@kernel.org>,
	"Network Development" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	xdp-hints@xdp-project.net
Subject: [xdp-hints] Re: [RFC bpf-next v3 09/14] net/mlx5e: Implement devtx kfuncs
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 21:59:44 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAADnVQJnf=KJ17MJWujkj+oSxp7kNNK1k08PvH+Wx617yAtZ8Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZK4eFox0DwbpyIJv@google.com>

On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 8:29 PM Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> wrote:
>
>
> This will slow things down, but not to the point where it's on par
> with doing sw checksum. At least in theory.
> We can't stay at skb when using AF_XDP. AF_XDP would benefit from having
> the offloads.

To clarify: yes, AF_XDP needs generalized HW offloads.
I just don't see how xdp tx offloads are moving a needle in that direction.

> I hope we can both agree that with an api like
> mlx5_l4_csum_offload(bool encap) we can't be 100% certain that the
> hw is gonna handle any packet layout? So how is that different
> from a generic api that also can't work in all cases?

If it's hw specific then yes.
Will [mlx5|...]_l4_csum_offload apply to other nics? I doubt.

> AF_XDP is a generic layer for low-level access and it provides generic
> descriptor format, so why suddenly we have this requirement where we have
> to do prog rewrite for every new nic?
>
> Current AF_XDP programs are pretty portable (obviously depend on
> a bunch of nic features), it seems like a good idea to try to preserve
> this property? (again, with an asterisk, where we should allow some
> differentiation, etc, etc)

Agree. AF_XDP needs a generic api that will allow user space
request HW to do TSO, csum offload, etc.
xdp tx and af_xdp are too different to pull under the same framework.
xdp progs will interact with the kernel via kfuncs.
af_xdp needs a different api to express packet geometry and offload requests.
The user space cannot do it with bpf programs.
In case of AF_XDP the bpf prog in the kernel is a filter only.
For the majority of the cases bpf prog is not necessary and shouldn't be
required to express HW offloads.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-07-12  4:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-07 19:29 [xdp-hints] [RFC bpf-next v3 00/14] bpf: Netdev TX metadata Stanislav Fomichev
2023-07-07 19:29 ` [xdp-hints] [RFC bpf-next v3 01/14] bpf: Rename some xdp-metadata functions into dev-bound Stanislav Fomichev
2023-07-07 19:29 ` [xdp-hints] [RFC bpf-next v3 02/14] bpf: Make it easier to add new metadata kfunc Stanislav Fomichev
2023-07-07 19:29 ` [xdp-hints] [RFC bpf-next v3 03/14] xsk: Support XDP_TX_METADATA_LEN Stanislav Fomichev
2023-07-07 19:29 ` [xdp-hints] [RFC bpf-next v3 04/14] bpf: Implement devtx hook points Stanislav Fomichev
2023-07-07 19:29 ` [xdp-hints] [RFC bpf-next v3 05/14] bpf: Implement devtx timestamp kfunc Stanislav Fomichev
2023-07-07 19:29 ` [xdp-hints] [RFC bpf-next v3 06/14] net: veth: Implement devtx timestamp kfuncs Stanislav Fomichev
2023-07-07 19:29 ` [xdp-hints] [RFC bpf-next v3 07/14] bpf: Introduce tx checksum devtx kfuncs Stanislav Fomichev
2023-07-07 19:30 ` [xdp-hints] [RFC bpf-next v3 08/14] net: veth: Implement devtx tx checksum Stanislav Fomichev
2023-07-07 19:30 ` [xdp-hints] [RFC bpf-next v3 09/14] net/mlx5e: Implement devtx kfuncs Stanislav Fomichev
2023-07-11 22:56   ` [xdp-hints] " Alexei Starovoitov
2023-07-11 23:24     ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-07-11 23:45       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-07-12  0:14         ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-07-12  2:50           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-07-12  3:29             ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-07-12  4:59               ` Alexei Starovoitov [this message]
2023-07-12  5:36                 ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-07-12 15:16                   ` Willem de Bruijn
2023-07-12 16:28                     ` Willem de Bruijn
2023-07-12 19:03                     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-07-12 19:11                       ` Willem de Bruijn
2023-07-12 19:42                         ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-07-12 20:09                           ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-07-12 20:53                             ` Stanislav Fomichev
2023-07-12  0:32     ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-07-12  2:37       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-07-12  3:07         ` Jakub Kicinski
2023-07-12  3:23           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-07-07 19:30 ` [xdp-hints] [RFC bpf-next v3 10/14] selftests/xsk: Support XDP_TX_METADATA_LEN Stanislav Fomichev
2023-07-07 19:30 ` [xdp-hints] [RFC bpf-next v3 11/14] selftests/bpf: Add helper to query current netns cookie Stanislav Fomichev
2023-07-07 19:30 ` [xdp-hints] [RFC bpf-next v3 12/14] selftests/bpf: Add csum helpers Stanislav Fomichev
2023-07-07 19:30 ` [xdp-hints] [RFC bpf-next v3 13/14] selftests/bpf: Extend xdp_metadata with devtx kfuncs Stanislav Fomichev
2023-07-07 19:30 ` [xdp-hints] [RFC bpf-next v3 14/14] selftests/bpf: Extend xdp_hw_metadata " Stanislav Fomichev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.xdp-project.net/postorius/lists/xdp-hints.xdp-project.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAADnVQJnf=KJ17MJWujkj+oSxp7kNNK1k08PvH+Wx617yAtZ8Q@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=hawk@kernel.org \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
    --cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=toke@kernel.org \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    --cc=xdp-hints@xdp-project.net \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox