XDP hardware hints discussion mail archive
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@redhat.com>
To: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@intel.com>,
	Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
Cc: brouer@redhat.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	xdp-hints@xdp-project.net, martin.lau@kernel.org,
	daniel@iogearbox.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>,
	yoong.siang.song@intel.com, anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com,
	intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org
Subject: [xdp-hints] Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH bpf-next V1] igc: enable and fix RX hash usage by netstack
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 16:17:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9a7a44a6-ec0c-e5e9-1c94-ccc0d1755560@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b6143e67-a0f1-a238-f901-448b85281154@intel.com>


On 14/02/2023 16.13, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
> From: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 16:00:52 +0100
>>
>> Am 10.02.23 um 16:07 schrieb Jesper Dangaard Brouer:
>>> When function igc_rx_hash() was introduced in v4.20 via commit 0507ef8a0372
>>> ("igc: Add transmit and receive fastpath and interrupt handlers"), the
>>> hardware wasn't configured to provide RSS hash, thus it made sense to not
>>> enable net_device NETIF_F_RXHASH feature bit.
>>>
[...]
>>
>>> hash value doesn't include UDP port numbers. Not being PKT_HASH_TYPE_L4, have
>>> the effect that netstack will do a software based hash calc calling into
>>> flow_dissect, but only when code calls skb_get_hash(), which doesn't
>>> necessary happen for local delivery.
>>
>> Excuse my ignorance, but is that bug visible in practice by users
>> (performance?) or is that fix needed for future work?
> 
> Hash calculation always happens when RPS or RFS is enabled. So having no
> hash in skb before hitting the netstack slows down their performance.
> Also, no hash in skb passed from the driver results in worse NAPI bucket
> distribution when there are more traffic flows than Rx queues / CPUs.
> + Netfilter needs hashes on some configurations.
> 

Thanks Olek for explaining that.

My perf measurements show that the expensive part is that netstack will
call the flow_dissector code, when the hardware RX-hash is missing.

>>
>>> Fixes: 2121c2712f82 ("igc: Add multiple receive queues control
>>> supporting")
>>> Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
> 
> [...]
> 
> Nice to see that you also care about (not) using short types on the stack :)

As can be seen by godbolt.org exploration[0] I have done, the stack
isn't used for storing the values.

  [0] 
https://github.com/xdp-project/xdp-project/tree/master/areas/hints/godbolt/

I have created three files[2] with C-code that can be compiled via 
https://godbolt.org/.  The C-code contains a comment with the ASM code 
that was generated with -02 with compiler x86-64 gcc 12.2.

The first file[01] corresponds to this patch.

  [01] 
https://github.com/xdp-project/xdp-project/blob/master/areas/hints/godbolt/igc_godbolt01.c
  [G01] https://godbolt.org/z/j79M9aTsn

The second file igc_godbolt02.c [02] have changes in [diff02]

  [02] 
https://github.com/xdp-project/xdp-project/blob/master/areas/hints/godbolt/igc_godbolt02.c
  [G02] https://godbolt.org/z/sErqe4qd5
  [diff02] https://github.com/xdp-project/xdp-project/commit/1f3488a932767

The third file igc_godbolt03.c [03] have changes in [diff03]

  [03] 
https://github.com/xdp-project/xdp-project/blob/master/areas/hints/godbolt/igc_godbolt03.c
  [G03] https://godbolt.org/z/5K3vE1Wsv
  [diff03] https://github.com/xdp-project/xdp-project/commit/aa9298f68705

Summary, the only thing we can save is replacing some movzx
(zero-extend) with mov instructions.

>>
>> [1]: https://notabs.org/coding/smallIntsBigPenalty.htm
> 
> Thanks,
> Olek
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2023-02-16 15:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-10 15:07 [xdp-hints] " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2023-02-10 15:23 ` [xdp-hints] " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2023-02-14 13:21 ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-02-16 16:46   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2023-02-20 15:39     ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-02-22 15:00       ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2023-02-24 16:41         ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-02-27 14:24           ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-02-14 15:00 ` [xdp-hints] Re: [Intel-wired-lan] " Paul Menzel
2023-02-14 15:13   ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-02-16 15:17     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2023-02-16 15:43       ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-02-27 14:53         ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-02-16 13:29   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2023-02-16 15:34     ` Alexander Lobakin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.xdp-project.net/postorius/lists/xdp-hints.xdp-project.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9a7a44a6-ec0c-e5e9-1c94-ccc0d1755560@redhat.com \
    --to=jbrouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=alexandr.lobakin@intel.com \
    --cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=xdp-hints@xdp-project.net \
    --cc=yoong.siang.song@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox