From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
martin.lau@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
alexandr.lobakin@intel.com, larysa.zaremba@intel.com,
xdp-hints@xdp-project.net, anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com,
yoong.siang.song@intel.com, boon.leong.ong@intel.com,
intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
jesse.brandeburg@intel.com, kuba@kernel.org, edumazet@google.com,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, hawk@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net
Subject: [xdp-hints] Re: [PATCH bpf RFC-V2 1/5] xdp: rss hash types representation
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2023 23:46:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87355nnsdb.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <168010734324.3039990.16454026957159811204.stgit@firesoul>
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com> writes:
> diff --git a/net/core/xdp.c b/net/core/xdp.c
> index 7133017bcd74..81d41df30695 100644
> --- a/net/core/xdp.c
> +++ b/net/core/xdp.c
> @@ -721,12 +721,14 @@ __bpf_kfunc int bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_timestamp(const struct xdp_md *ctx, u64 *tim
> * @hash: Return value pointer.
> *
> * Return:
> - * * Returns 0 on success or ``-errno`` on error.
> + * * Returns (positive) RSS hash **type** on success or ``-errno`` on error.
This change is going to break any BPF program that does:
if (!bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_hash(ctx, &hash))
/* do something with hash */
so I think adding a second argument is better; that way, at least
breakage will be explicit instead of being a hidden change in semantics
(and the CO-RE style checking for kfuncs Alexei introduced should
trigger correctly).
But really, what we should do anyway is merge this during the -rc phase
to minimise any breakage :)
-Toke
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-29 21:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-29 16:28 [xdp-hints] [PATCH bpf RFC-V2 0/5] XDP-hints: API change for RX-hash kfunc bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_hash Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2023-03-29 16:29 ` [xdp-hints] [PATCH bpf RFC-V2 1/5] xdp: rss hash types representation Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2023-03-29 17:59 ` [xdp-hints] " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2023-03-29 21:46 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2023-03-29 16:29 ` [xdp-hints] [PATCH bpf RFC-V2 2/5] igc: bpf_xdp_metadata_rx_hash return xdp rss hash type Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2023-03-29 16:29 ` [xdp-hints] [PATCH bpf RFC-V2 3/5] veth: " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2023-03-29 16:29 ` [xdp-hints] [PATCH bpf RFC-V2 4/5] mlx5: " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2023-03-29 16:29 ` [xdp-hints] [PATCH bpf RFC-V2 5/5] mlx4: " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.xdp-project.net/postorius/lists/xdp-hints.xdp-project.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87355nnsdb.fsf@toke.dk \
--to=toke@redhat.com \
--cc=alexandr.lobakin@intel.com \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=boon.leong.ong@intel.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=larysa.zaremba@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=xdp-hints@xdp-project.net \
--cc=yoong.siang.song@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox