From: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, xdp-hints@xdp-project.net,
martin.lau@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>,
yoong.siang.song@intel.com, anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com,
intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org
Subject: [xdp-hints] Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH bpf-next V1] igc: enable and fix RX hash usage by netstack
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 16:00:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6a5ded96-2425-ff9b-c1b1-eca1c103164c@molgen.mpg.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <167604167956.1726972.7266620647404438534.stgit@firesoul>
Dear Jesper,
Thank you very much for your patch.
Am 10.02.23 um 16:07 schrieb Jesper Dangaard Brouer:
> When function igc_rx_hash() was introduced in v4.20 via commit 0507ef8a0372
> ("igc: Add transmit and receive fastpath and interrupt handlers"), the
> hardware wasn't configured to provide RSS hash, thus it made sense to not
> enable net_device NETIF_F_RXHASH feature bit.
>
> The NIC hardware was configured to enable RSS hash info in v5.2 via commit
> 2121c2712f82 ("igc: Add multiple receive queues control supporting"), but
> forgot to set the NETIF_F_RXHASH feature bit.
>
> The original implementation of igc_rx_hash() didn't extract the associated
> pkt_hash_type, but statically set PKT_HASH_TYPE_L3. The largest portions of
> this patch are about extracting the RSS Type from the hardware and mapping
> this to enum pkt_hash_types. This were based on Foxville i225 software user
s/This were/This was/
> manual rev-1.3.1 and tested on Intel Ethernet Controller I225-LM (rev 03).
>
> For UDP it's worth noting that RSS (type) hashing have been disabled both for
> IPv4 and IPv6 (see IGC_MRQC_RSS_FIELD_IPV4_UDP + IGC_MRQC_RSS_FIELD_IPV6_UDP)
> because hardware RSS doesn't handle fragmented pkts well when enabled (can
> cause out-of-order). This result in PKT_HASH_TYPE_L3 for UDP packets, and
result*s*
> hash value doesn't include UDP port numbers. Not being PKT_HASH_TYPE_L4, have
> the effect that netstack will do a software based hash calc calling into
> flow_dissect, but only when code calls skb_get_hash(), which doesn't
> necessary happen for local delivery.
Excuse my ignorance, but is that bug visible in practice by users
(performance?) or is that fix needed for future work?
> Fixes: 2121c2712f82 ("igc: Add multiple receive queues control supporting")
> Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc.h | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++---
> 2 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc.h
> index df3e26c0cf01..a112eeb59525 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc.h
> @@ -311,6 +311,58 @@ extern char igc_driver_name[];
> #define IGC_MRQC_RSS_FIELD_IPV4_UDP 0x00400000
> #define IGC_MRQC_RSS_FIELD_IPV6_UDP 0x00800000
>
> +/* RX-desc Write-Back format RSS Type's */
> +enum igc_rss_type_num {
> + IGC_RSS_TYPE_NO_HASH = 0,
> + IGC_RSS_TYPE_HASH_TCP_IPV4 = 1,
> + IGC_RSS_TYPE_HASH_IPV4 = 2,
> + IGC_RSS_TYPE_HASH_TCP_IPV6 = 3,
> + IGC_RSS_TYPE_HASH_IPV6_EX = 4,
> + IGC_RSS_TYPE_HASH_IPV6 = 5,
> + IGC_RSS_TYPE_HASH_TCP_IPV6_EX = 6,
> + IGC_RSS_TYPE_HASH_UDP_IPV4 = 7,
> + IGC_RSS_TYPE_HASH_UDP_IPV6 = 8,
> + IGC_RSS_TYPE_HASH_UDP_IPV6_EX = 9,
> + IGC_RSS_TYPE_MAX = 10,
> +};
> +#define IGC_RSS_TYPE_MAX_TABLE 16
> +#define IGC_RSS_TYPE_MASK 0xF
> +
> +/* igc_rss_type - Rx descriptor RSS type field */
> +static inline u8 igc_rss_type(union igc_adv_rx_desc *rx_desc)
> +{
> + /* RSS Type 4-bit number: 0-9 (above 9 is reserved) */
> + return rx_desc->wb.lower.lo_dword.hs_rss.pkt_info & IGC_RSS_TYPE_MASK;
> +}
Is it necessary to specficy the length of the return value, or could it
be `unsigned int`. Using “native” types is normally more performant [1].
`scripts/bloat-o-meter` might help to verify that.
[…]
> static inline void igc_rx_hash(struct igc_ring *ring,
> union igc_adv_rx_desc *rx_desc,
> struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> - if (ring->netdev->features & NETIF_F_RXHASH)
> - skb_set_hash(skb,
> - le32_to_cpu(rx_desc->wb.lower.hi_dword.rss),
> - PKT_HASH_TYPE_L3);
> + if (ring->netdev->features & NETIF_F_RXHASH) {
> + u32 rss_hash = le32_to_cpu(rx_desc->wb.lower.hi_dword.rss);
> + u8 rss_type = igc_rss_type(rx_desc);
Amongst others, also here.
> + enum pkt_hash_types hash_type;
> +
> + hash_type = igc_rss_type_table[rss_type].hash_type;
> + skb_set_hash(skb, rss_hash, hash_type);
> + }
> }
>
> static void igc_rx_vlan(struct igc_ring *rx_ring,
> @@ -6501,6 +6527,7 @@ static int igc_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> netdev->features |= NETIF_F_TSO;
> netdev->features |= NETIF_F_TSO6;
> netdev->features |= NETIF_F_TSO_ECN;
> + netdev->features |= NETIF_F_RXHASH;
> netdev->features |= NETIF_F_RXCSUM;
> netdev->features |= NETIF_F_HW_CSUM;
> netdev->features |= NETIF_F_SCTP_CRC;
Kind regards,
Paul
[1]: https://notabs.org/coding/smallIntsBigPenalty.htm
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-14 15:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-10 15:07 [xdp-hints] " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2023-02-10 15:23 ` [xdp-hints] " Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2023-02-14 13:21 ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-02-16 16:46 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2023-02-20 15:39 ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-02-22 15:00 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2023-02-24 16:41 ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-02-27 14:24 ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-02-14 15:00 ` Paul Menzel [this message]
2023-02-14 15:13 ` [xdp-hints] Re: [Intel-wired-lan] " Alexander Lobakin
2023-02-16 15:17 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2023-02-16 15:43 ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-02-27 14:53 ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-02-16 13:29 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2023-02-16 15:34 ` Alexander Lobakin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.xdp-project.net/postorius/lists/xdp-hints.xdp-project.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6a5ded96-2425-ff9b-c1b1-eca1c103164c@molgen.mpg.de \
--to=pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=xdp-hints@xdp-project.net \
--cc=yoong.siang.song@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox