From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.21]) by mail.toke.dk (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDCA7AD7067 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2025 08:25:15 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: mail.toke.dk; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=Intel header.b=NM9TRsvx DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1737357916; x=1768893916; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=k4ykqooUPTL/roXw/fFpliH2XGWlf7OfDPK35rRh9HA=; b=NM9TRsvxs3HZggYPAmepxLA5HuHkwAJJaTu852WGVkyn+kPA+GOokD9R IilIShafAHFZMHlJVmuUszBlPCz+rwNXApyCiDNAE7Cr7qUAwrcX3s3sH 645PAUt9bjSmL0aSOBe8/Fc1JSU4yZzLwXgH0QsvIUQ+3uYDTfUagxBaf mB0FvSrkJxFymUt+mME8OkC7K6JTBPzEVh7zX0GMKfix0lkNHQjFKvBwx 89PoNAFAdByugakutxKyyjc16/OSbtnfdoBPWqSwnUDb9ic723dmgog8c yh4ASzJnXAShFcSBuEjwrcJMZB9lp7e8sUtJYePlWrdatLL5pXHK/OERH Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: Sr4tiS2aRj2TubC7/gDJpg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: tfCQ1OP9QIma8HiwsxhH3A== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11320"; a="37601859" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.13,218,1732608000"; d="scan'208";a="37601859" Received: from orviesa009.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.149]) by orvoesa113.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Jan 2025 23:25:12 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: vyQrnkD1RKuZNocxarZucg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 4NfaGBcnSKmXfEo/7NNF7Q== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.13,218,1732608000"; d="scan'208";a="106224522" Received: from unknown (HELO [10.107.2.109]) ([10.107.2.109]) by orviesa009-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Jan 2025 23:25:02 -0800 Message-ID: <20fa0b55-405c-4b7c-8c10-1f8d71c956b9@linux.intel.com> Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 15:24:46 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: "Abdul Rahim, Faizal" , Song Yoong Siang , "David S . Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Simon Horman , Willem de Bruijn , Florian Bezdeka , Donald Hunter , Jonathan Corbet , Bjorn Topel , Magnus Karlsson , Maciej Fijalkowski , Jonathan Lemon , Andrew Lunn , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Jesper Dangaard Brouer , John Fastabend , Joe Damato , Stanislav Fomichev , Xuan Zhuo , Mina Almasry , Daniel Jurgens , Andrii Nakryiko , Eduard Zingerman , Mykola Lysenko , Martin KaFai Lau , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , KP Singh , Hao Luo , Jiri Olsa , Shuah Khan , Alexandre Torgue , Jose Abreu , Maxime Coquelin , Tony Nguyen , Przemek Kitszel References: <20250116155350.555374-1-yoong.siang.song@intel.com> <20250116155350.555374-5-yoong.siang.song@intel.com> <84770113-2546-4035-8bd4-bf9cedcfb00f@linux.intel.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Choong Yong Liang In-Reply-To: <84770113-2546-4035-8bd4-bf9cedcfb00f@linux.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID-Hash: YVMUPENTPZAQWUF2YNSCX3PROP7XUNMU X-Message-ID-Hash: YVMUPENTPZAQWUF2YNSCX3PROP7XUNMU X-MailFrom: yong.liang.choong@linux.intel.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; loop; banned-address; emergency; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header CC: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org, xdp-hints@xdp-project.net X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.10 Precedence: list Subject: [xdp-hints] Re: [PATCH bpf-next v6 4/4] igc: Add launch time support to XDP ZC List-Id: XDP hardware hints design discussion Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On 20/1/2025 2:25 pm, Abdul Rahim, Faizal wrote: > > To be cautious, could we perform a stress test by sending a higher number > of packets with launch time? For example, we could send 200 packets, each > configured with a launch time, and verify that the driver continues to > function correctly afterward. > I agree on this point. Could you perform the same stress test on the STMMAC driver as well?