From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by mail.toke.dk (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0EAFA2A688 for ; Fri, 15 Sep 2023 11:45:10 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: mail.toke.dk; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=Intel header.b=e4HhxS74 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1694771110; x=1726307110; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=0rV9VG8TKb4cPuL/9qputjsI4zy07ien126tpL7W2Ic=; b=e4HhxS74NDlrMlfBLMRqppbbWKym6ynPeZWB9tU0qCmFMgPu93QdLNta pJOZ9YxfcaCCykg1QvErssx03/KGvbodhTPjMs1NI22P2o/DhC3+5iLnh BICJjjYbv1gJoEKGMM/SADQLvX37tStScka+nlvgBt+Bc3RjmUVF/D2VD wjqOEI/a5zmB/n9keFC3lmlTtKg4dNvs8rR7q5+UJJ1wY9t2RfycXNYx3 MTBDlMdAr2VYqtS7erI7OmbJGe/sEuG5N7LHurbzgJykKdlwgW6v/9wE7 FVkqLnq/iKsUBGtDUcIb5AadYeWlHqOOdOQlrwPPseevqcmyfdQA+bIIT Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10833"; a="379128438" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.02,148,1688454000"; d="scan'208";a="379128438" Received: from orsmga008.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.65]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Sep 2023 02:45:07 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10833"; a="774246375" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.02,148,1688454000"; d="scan'208";a="774246375" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO 9ef86b2655e5) ([10.239.97.151]) by orsmga008.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 Sep 2023 02:45:01 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 9ef86b2655e5 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1qh5Nj-0002mV-1R; Fri, 15 Sep 2023 09:44:59 +0000 Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2023 17:44:43 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Stanislav Fomichev , bpf@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <202309151727.81IIJrBK-lkp@intel.com> References: <20230914210452.2588884-3-sdf@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230914210452.2588884-3-sdf@google.com> Message-ID-Hash: W7NRIKJRCEHPU4ZZBJ5ZTJJN4PQPE3JK X-Message-ID-Hash: W7NRIKJRCEHPU4ZZBJ5ZTJJN4PQPE3JK X-MailFrom: lkp@intel.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header CC: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org, yhs@fb.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@google.com, haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org, toke@kernel.org, willemb@google.com, dsahern@kernel.org, magnus.karlsson@intel.com, bjorn@kernel.org, maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com, hawk@kernel.org, yoong.siang.song@intel.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, xdp-hints@xdp-project.net X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.8 Precedence: list Subject: [xdp-hints] Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/9] xsk: add TX timestamp and TX checksum offload support List-Id: XDP hardware hints design discussion Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Hi Stanislav, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on bpf-next/master] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Stanislav-Fomichev/xsk-Support-tx_metadata_len/20230915-051153 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230914210452.2588884-3-sdf%40google.com patch subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/9] xsk: add TX timestamp and TX checksum offload support config: um-allnoconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230915/202309151727.81IIJrBK-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 17.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git 4a5ac14ee968ff0ad5d2cc1ffa0299048db4c88a) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230915/202309151727.81IIJrBK-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309151727.81IIJrBK-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from net/core/filter.c:21: In file included from include/linux/bpf_verifier.h:7: In file included from include/linux/bpf.h:31: In file included from include/linux/memcontrol.h:13: In file included from include/linux/cgroup.h:26: In file included from include/linux/kernel_stat.h:9: In file included from include/linux/interrupt.h:11: In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11: In file included from arch/um/include/asm/hardirq.h:5: In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17: In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20: In file included from include/linux/io.h:13: In file included from arch/um/include/asm/io.h:24: include/asm-generic/io.h:547:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 547 | val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:560:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 560 | val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr)); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:37:51: note: expanded from macro '__le16_to_cpu' 37 | #define __le16_to_cpu(x) ((__force __u16)(__le16)(x)) | ^ In file included from net/core/filter.c:21: In file included from include/linux/bpf_verifier.h:7: In file included from include/linux/bpf.h:31: In file included from include/linux/memcontrol.h:13: In file included from include/linux/cgroup.h:26: In file included from include/linux/kernel_stat.h:9: In file included from include/linux/interrupt.h:11: In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11: In file included from arch/um/include/asm/hardirq.h:5: In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17: In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20: In file included from include/linux/io.h:13: In file included from arch/um/include/asm/io.h:24: include/asm-generic/io.h:573:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 573 | val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr)); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:35:51: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu' 35 | #define __le32_to_cpu(x) ((__force __u32)(__le32)(x)) | ^ In file included from net/core/filter.c:21: In file included from include/linux/bpf_verifier.h:7: In file included from include/linux/bpf.h:31: In file included from include/linux/memcontrol.h:13: In file included from include/linux/cgroup.h:26: In file included from include/linux/kernel_stat.h:9: In file included from include/linux/interrupt.h:11: In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11: In file included from arch/um/include/asm/hardirq.h:5: In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17: In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20: In file included from include/linux/io.h:13: In file included from arch/um/include/asm/io.h:24: include/asm-generic/io.h:584:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 584 | __raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:594:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 594 | __raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:604:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 604 | __raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:692:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 692 | readsb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:700:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 700 | readsw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:708:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 708 | readsl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:717:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 717 | writesb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:726:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 726 | writesw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:735:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 735 | writesl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ In file included from net/core/filter.c:62: >> include/net/xdp_sock.h:183:52: warning: declaration of 'struct xsk_tx_metadata_comp' will not be visible outside of this function [-Wvisibility] 183 | static inline void xsk_tx_metadata_complete(struct xsk_tx_metadata_comp *compl, | ^ 13 warnings generated. vim +183 include/net/xdp_sock.h 182 > 183 static inline void xsk_tx_metadata_complete(struct xsk_tx_metadata_comp *compl, 184 const struct xsk_tx_metadata_ops *ops, 185 void *priv) 186 { 187 } 188 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki