From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: mail.toke.dk; spf=pass (mailfrom) smtp.mailfrom=intel.com (client-ip=134.134.136.126; helo=mgamail.intel.com; envelope-from=lkp@intel.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: mail.toke.dk; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=Intel header.b=B83R3bYJ Received: from mgamail.intel.com (unknown [134.134.136.126]) by mail.toke.dk (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBA60A1CDE4 for ; Fri, 28 Jul 2023 23:02:46 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1690578170; x=1722114170; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=TEuzJH5k9NjiUQxxhE7uZppNJs34BvDLFgeNAlEl6/4=; b=B83R3bYJoZI7bvgBuNXc1qP8W3Ix3zkg7oSvPoqHCXLsPxMwxjEKPCZF YgoM5rbSLguzA3zBX9JAlejf9VDT73C0XR9fx+WGdpmPB6vTcZ7wLh1wN 3CB+XtN7UCaEikgmxpmOCQOg9BVa9AQLSccPZoABw9IZDdADlvgVIXtcx ntyG2olT8n5r7xaRRzpfqpMIknEJ2m4QXajZ47NPsDvBzmSZiefxhA4Kr 6jObxvT/Sd1ecjrqqmJDLe/iaOV+Es5x7Ag9OoEUDzzrqhC7RFAO/UCt0 VqqEXXqIFSKRHOhNmWSgEzyWartIT7Y3CwlJV9WdZs+cjM1Dcv7KMpIGF w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10785"; a="353588603" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.01,238,1684825200"; d="scan'208";a="353588603" Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by orsmga106.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 28 Jul 2023 14:02:41 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10785"; a="817634323" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.01,238,1684825200"; d="scan'208";a="817634323" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO 953e8cd98f7d) ([10.239.97.151]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 28 Jul 2023 14:02:35 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 953e8cd98f7d with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1qPUba-0003Zk-1M; Fri, 28 Jul 2023 21:02:34 +0000 Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2023 05:02:25 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Larysa Zaremba , bpf@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <202307290459.rfUV5NZw-lkp@intel.com> References: <20230728173923.1318596-14-larysa.zaremba@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230728173923.1318596-14-larysa.zaremba@intel.com> Message-ID-Hash: U6WDNF2XTHKO4LRKUENNAUWCQO3PYSTG X-Message-ID-Hash: U6WDNF2XTHKO4LRKUENNAUWCQO3PYSTG X-MailFrom: lkp@intel.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header CC: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Larysa Zaremba , ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org, yhs@fb.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@google.com, haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, David Ahern , Jakub Kicinski , Willem de Bruijn , Jesper Dangaard Brouer , Anatoly Burakov , Alexander Lobakin , Magnus Karlsson , Maryam Tahhan , xdp-hints@xdp-project.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov , Simon Horman X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.8 Precedence: list Subject: [xdp-hints] Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 13/21] ice: Implement checksum hint List-Id: XDP hardware hints design discussion Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Hi Larysa, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on bpf-next/master] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Larysa-Zaremba/ice-make-RX-HW-timestamp-reading-code-more-reusable/20230729-023952 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230728173923.1318596-14-larysa.zaremba%40intel.com patch subject: [PATCH bpf-next v4 13/21] ice: Implement checksum hint config: i386-randconfig-i012-20230728 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230729/202307290459.rfUV5NZw-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 16.0.4 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git ae42196bc493ffe877a7e3dff8be32035dea4d07) reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230729/202307290459.rfUV5NZw-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202307290459.rfUV5NZw-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_txrx_lib.c:674: warning: expecting prototype for ice_xdp_rx_csum_lvl(). Prototype was for ice_xdp_rx_csum() instead vim +674 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_txrx_lib.c 662 663 /** 664 * ice_xdp_rx_csum_lvl - Get level, at which HW has checked the checksum 665 * @ctx: XDP buff pointer 666 * @csum_status: destination address 667 * @csum_info: destination address 668 * 669 * Copy HW checksum level (if was checked) to the destination address. 670 */ 671 static int ice_xdp_rx_csum(const struct xdp_md *ctx, 672 enum xdp_csum_status *csum_status, 673 union xdp_csum_info *csum_info) > 674 { 675 const struct ice_xdp_buff *xdp_ext = (void *)ctx; 676 const union ice_32b_rx_flex_desc *eop_desc; 677 enum ice_rx_csum_status status; 678 u16 ptype; 679 680 eop_desc = xdp_ext->pkt_ctx.eop_desc; 681 ptype = ice_get_ptype(eop_desc); 682 683 status = ice_get_rx_csum_status(eop_desc, ptype); 684 if (status & ICE_RX_CSUM_NONE) 685 return -ENODATA; 686 687 *csum_status = XDP_CHECKSUM_VALID_LVL0 + ice_rx_csum_lvl(status); 688 return 0; 689 } 690 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki